Bold prediction of CDK possibly confirmed!!!!
[Advanced Creation Science]
This morning, after much searching I may have found confirming evidence of a VERY VERY bold prediction of Barry Setterfield’s light speed decay theory. Light speed decay (CDK) theory predicts that we will see celestial objects move in slow motion (time dilation) depending on an equation calculated by Dr. Stephen Cheesman. For example, the degree of time dilation predicted when we start to look at objects at say about 30,000 light years is about 59, their physical motions will appear to be slowed down by factors of 59!
In a survey of Visual Photometric Binary stars and Visually accessible Spectroscopic Binary stars, I have found confirming evidence of this time dilation! Astronmers have acknoweldged the anomaly and tried to explain away the fact that as one looks farther out from Earth there is an increase in population of slow visual Binary Stars (Stars which orbit one another), or apparently no binary stars at all. Actually, with extreme time dilation, binary stars will look frozen, and this is actually what we are seeing in globular clusters 30,000 light years away.
I have also asserted that there are only supposed eclipsing binaries detected by micro-lensing techniques which are not binaries at all.
I would welcome review of the current work on this subject as it would confirm:
1. Intelligent Design
2. Recent Special Creation
Visit www.YoungCosmosDiscussion.com
regards to everyone, especially my brethren,
Salvador
I have just communicated with the Setterfield’s. They are excited over these developments. They are involved in a major project right now and will get back to us. They are delighted with these developments.
Many thanks to everyone.
Comment by Salvador — July 25, 2007 @ 4:28 pm
Great stuff Sal! Keep up the good work.
Comment by Jehu. — July 26, 2007 @ 3:28 am
Sal,
If your find is verified to be true, then congratulations(!!); it would certainly be an excellent discovery of a risky theoretical prediction. To test it further: Could a predictive curve be calculated? And is there enough suitable data to test for a statistically significant fit to such a curve?
Comment by JGuy — July 29, 2007 @ 5:06 am
JGuy,
There will be more tests. Unfortunately for now, Dr. Cheesman, Barry and I haven’t worked out the details. Dr. Cheesman’s calculation, if true and IF [a BIG IF] CDK is true is that the univere is [gasp] not 13,000,000,000 light years across (the meaning of raidus and diameter is a bit flakey because of the non-Euclidean geometries involved), but rather 110,000 light years acorss. Meaning, all the celestial phenomena are packed, and our measurement apparatus is all out of whack.
This can be confirmed with improved parallax measurements. We see some hints of this at 300 light years (see the pleiades distance debate), but it will really assert itself with supposed gargantuan distances like the great galaxy Andromeda. Too early to tell!
It will probably take a year to uncoil the math into something workable. You’re of course welcome to help me set up the electronic peer-reviewed journal to study these issues (hint, hint).
Salvador
Comment by Salvador — July 29, 2007 @ 2:50 pm
Sal,
I’m not sure how one would go about setting up a peer reviewed e-journal. How can I help?
Comment by JGuy — July 30, 2007 @ 6:27 pm
I’m going to be talking to some researchers. The goal is to have a repository of papers that people feel can be a good theoretical and empirical starting point. A good model is Arxiv.org
There are two parts:
1. the authors, editors, and publishers
2. the web admins
I could probably set it up myself. I could use help for the web page and website that will host the papers. I don’t expect a large volume. Maybe 2 papers a month?
regards,
Salvador
Comment by Salvador — July 31, 2007 @ 12:22 am
Please Note:
ATTENTION! YOUNG COSMOS HAS MOVED!
Salvador
Comment by scordova — August 6, 2007 @ 11:16 pm